Jump to content

Soslammed

Members
  • Content Count

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Soslammed last won the day on March 12

Soslammed had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

36 Excellent

About Soslammed

  • Rank
    Gnoll

Recent Profile Visitors

495 profile views
  1. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    How many IoC and AV have you played on the 'server we came from' ? Sunwell's the best place we've had, just gotta regather twinks here since a lot seem confused about what to do.
  2. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    It''s horde season right now. Yeah, who'd have thought it'd happen again, how did dinging 80s and going back to warmane as some of you were announcing during ally season go? Back then 2 weeks of ally domination was enough for y'all to lose your shit, and now horde is outnumbering us again for over a twice as long period, but now it's great because it's your side and you expect ally will just queue solo like everything was normal If you click a 'queue button' and its 4-12 for you, what is to be expected? A bg where sooner or later the opponent will have mass twinks while your team will keep increasing in lvlers. So yeah, the rule is: if the opposing faction outnumbers you with 1:2 ratio in terms of online and queued twinks (which is the case most of the time now), play defensive - form a premade. Because horde will have 8+ twinks either way so its the only way to make the match even I understand your worries about IoC though. We're stealing from you the opportunity to get mass honor as would inevitably happen with 38 twinks online on H and 17 on A. Sorry! I love IoC, hope by the time of next CTA the numbers will be more even, for now I discourage alliance to queue it.
  3. Your name - Soslammed Reported player's name - all that participate in the process as the enclosed screenshots depict. Date - 09-03-2019 Rule that was broken - 11. Fixed Arena and Battleground matches are strictly prohibited. Losing on purpose will result in the following punishments: 7 days of account suspension and no end-season prize in the first case; 60 days of account suspension, no end-season prize and removal of all PvP items - in the second and all the next cases. In some situations there may even be a permanent ban. Description: The group of players at the screenshots queues Eye of the Storm and never moves out of the starting spot. They are open about it, they are doing it in order to lose fast and gain experience because of the experience event. This has been going on for many battlegrounds, here are the screenshots that depict the process. I think this side effect of experience events (people queuing for quick loses) is pretty destructive to the pvp environment in the bracket and should be thought over. Evidence - screenshots attached. There is more screenshots done by other individual players who happen to join such battlegrounds in case more is required.
  4. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    Say what?😂
  5. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    How's moving to the new server? Fatality seems quite present, ask them if they wanna keep the tickets or sell them off-price to us
  6. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    Meanwhile, wsg CTA is quite active + the queue is in horde favor number wise most of the day, perhaps things shifting back to "normal" and horde won't have to flee the server as some of them claimed they will?
  7. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    @mpslayerx hey man, see you got tired of your russian guild and joined us (i mean, who wouldn't). Don't be ashamed to come out, we won't roast you ... too much.
  8. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    Yes, we did laugh at the fact horde complains about prot wars and planned prot premades for that sake at one point, judging how exagerrated the reaction to prots in bg was. Horde was winning all day long regardless of prots or not, until like 11pm which was the hour of bigger online on alliance - that's when we used to form some premades. Horde reaction? "Let's not queue after 11, bullshit". It's never been about fair games here, the majority of players on both sides enjoy when they are stomping their opponents.
  9. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    Wow Deni, I wish you were this dedicated and defensive of alliance when you rolled horde in the times worst for us. I wish you were this understanding when we talked during that time and I was sceptical there's any future for alliance, with low online and complete unwillingness to play. Your advises from that time? "Low queue makes it easier to queue premades, you have more control". Why don't you advise this now? We were demotivated to queue, but we didn't quit. Smucarlos the great GM was playing the almighty in the forums, saying things like "i dont care if this bracket dies" etc. If it takes so little time for horde to decide to change servers, gl with starting over every month I guess. I've learnt my lesson, I will not be crying and threatening I'll quit the server if if the bracket favors horde again. It's just like I said earlier. All hail Alzheimer.
  10. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    @EquusYou people always exaggerate. Of course nobody likes to be in the disadvantage, some people take it worse than others. History has proven that new twinks arrive/quit on a regular basis so I am not entirely worried. If anything I would look to deal with Doomcallers - that's what I like to call players that discourage others from queueing or repeat how ally/horde always wins and that there's no point queuing. With that you only solidify the current, unwanted state of the bracket. @Denilor would I recommend 70-79 here to new players? You should ask if I'd recommend WoW battlegrounds at all. I think I wouldn't, the design is bad, the victories are often predetermined by aspects that you have no control over when you single queue (NUMBER_OF_TWINKS + PLAYER_QUALITY + CLASS_SETUPS), and when you try to take control over them by queuing premades, you end up stomping a weaker non-premade team, which is just as bad. What this game needs is a way to easily queue arranged vs arranged that'd pop wiithout struggles or scheduling, but this isn't the case. So I guess we have to enjoy what we have or play something else.
  11. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    >AV only popped once whole weekend. Lie. Friday, Saturday, Sunday, all had at least 2-3 AVs. It's not a lot, but AV has never been popping much, people favor wsg over it. The other 40v40 bg - IoC, has way more pops. >Might be time to find a new server Yeah yeah, it's been less than 3 weeks since the period of horde having the upper hand in the number of twinks has ended and you're already having a breakdown? Seems like World of Warcraft has overrepresentation of people with Alzheimer. I've been repeating it and will continue to do so: this bracket is a sinusoid, the dominating faction changes every now and then. The quoted below post comes from ... 14 January.
  12. Hi, I'm writing with regard to the recent bans, in this case the ban of player Mysteries and rejection of his appeal (without providing the reason). I believe this ban is completely unjustified. This report thread: has stated that the rule broken was 'Use textures'. The Sunwell rules are listed here: https://sunwell.pl/page/rules I would like to point out the following: 1) There is no rule that anyhow relates to "using textures" 2) The term "using textures" is nowhere defined, therefore a lot of players have no clue what that means in practice The conclusion is: a player was banned for a rule that doesn't exist for doing something he can't have been aware of is bannable. This in itself is overstepping the powers, in this case by gamemaster Tide, and should not have resulted in a ban. --- However, even though there isn't an explicit rule that explains what "using textures" is and that it is bannable, this isn't the only problem here. I understand the intention of the ban was to punish a player for accessing inaccessible by other players spots, and this is why Mysteries has made an appeal in which he explains that the spots where he is standing are perfectly accessible and every player can get to them by simply using spacebar and jumping. Mysteries appeal: http://sunwell-community.com/index.php?/topic/6263-character-mysteries-banned-by-tide/) Banning players for simply jumping in spots that have not only been intentionally allowed in retail, but are easily accessed with basic game knowledge is completely unreasonable - and the 2 screenshots enclosed in Ssijek's report are exactly that. Regards, Soslammed
  13. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    You're either a person of low intellect or of so big prejudice that it gets in the way of interpreting my words accurately. Regardless of which one it is, it means discussing with you is fruitless, however I'll continue for your conviction in being the white knight here is truly amusing. Let me explain it to you as simply as I can think of: If one STARTS a certain activity, then STOPS it, then STARTS it again, then STOPS it, there are TWO separate periods of time during which the activity is considered ongoing. By saying I start using something as response to something else, it means both STARTS have a TRIGGER that made me perform certain actions for a finite period of time until I STOP. Since I'm sure you're not putting an effort to understand it, after all you've proven to be a "GNOME MAN BAD, GNOME MAN LIAR" type of NPC, I'll show some good will and explain it further. Period#1 - I notice Teacuppy, Smilnik, Castor FAP while flag carrying or in random fights. I start using FAP. I notice they stop. I stop. Period#2 - I notice Skaredaqt, Barar making dedicated FC builds and fap every game. I atart using FAP. They seem to have stopped (at least I havent seen/heard about it a while). I stop. So what you quoted first was me referring to the recent events (Period#2), but since the blame game by definition goes backward, you point out there was a time the warrior toons didn't exist. So yes, I follow the time travel with you and bring other horde toons into discussion, who existed and practiced FAP runs (Period#1) and were the initiate reason for why I put the "dozens of fap" in my bag. I do hope I made it clear enough for your thought process to embrace, but I aint a naive man, I'm sure you'll come up with something. By the way, why don't you introduce your toon name since you claim to know sooo much about me? I'm Soslammed, the gnomish personification of all evil in the world, what about you?
  14. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    For real mate now I'm replying out of pure entertainment: how is this a copy paste of this:
  15. Soslammed

    79 twinking

    The fact I'm present in a farming game doesn't make me a farmer, but judging from how you completely misquoted my post I now know you're simply trolling, have a good night m8!
×
×
  • Create New...